Sunday, November 06, 2005

 

Readings for the second mid-term

This is a re-cap of the readings you should review for the second mid-term:

Campbell Ch. 4: Analogical change

All of this chapter except Section 4.5 was covered in detail. You can ignore Section 4.5 in your review. For the other sections, you should be able to identify given examples or provide examples yourself of the various types.

Kuryłowycz

From the October 11 web handout,

The copies of the papers posted on October 20 are mainly for your reference and clarification. I am not requiring you to read them in detail. I do recommend reading the English translator's introductory notes, if you haven't read them already, as they contain helpful explanatory discussion.

The important points are outlined in the lecture notes posted October 20. These also contain the main points we covered on semantic change.

Semantic change and grammatical change

The parts to pay attention to were covered on the notes just mentioned. These are in Campbell Chapter 9. We only covered up to and including section 9.2.7 (pp. 252-262). You are not responsible for any of the rest of Chapter 9.

For syntactic change, you only need to read Section 10.4 from pages 292-293 and some of the examples that follow. You mainly need to know what it is and what the common signs of grammaticalization are.

Current issues in historical linguistics

You should be familiar with the points discussed regarding Lyle Campbell's State of the Art paper, linked from the posting on October 20. The outline of the notes is also in that posting. You should be prepared to discuss at least two of the current debates in historical linguistics.

Models of change and explanations

All of Chapter 7 (models) is relevant to what we covered. You should review all of it. Particularly, look at Section 7.5 which gives the framework of Weinreich et al.

For Chapter 11 on explanation, the important parts are 11.1, 11.2, and 11.4.6. The test will not include anything outside of that.

We discussed the unique circumstances of click consonants. You should be familiar with the extent of their range and where they came from. (This is also an areal linguistics topic.)

Areal linguistics

You should have read Campbell Chapter 12, although it is not necessary to read all of the examples which take up much of the chapter.

You should be familiar with Sarah Thomason's definition of a linguistic area as outlined in class and detailed in section 1 of her online paper linked from the course website. The rest of Thomason's paper is less important. Concentrate on Section 1. You should be able to name some linguistic area and you should know at least some of the languages involved. You should also be able to name the types of things that languages in such areas have in common. Some specific examples would be helpful here.

What you don't need to know are all the details of all of the examples. Those are mainly to clarify the principles involved.

Distant genetic relationships

The part of Chapter 13 to concentrate on is 13.1 and 13.2 (pp. 344-348). Know the general principles. You don't need to know all the languages in the list, but you should be familiar with these proposed groupings: Amerind, Eskimo-Uralic (and Ural-Altaic, Ural-Altaic/Eskimo-Aleut), Eurasiatic, Nostratic, Proto-World.

History of writing

You should read Section 14.5 of Campbell, although nothing in there is likely to be included on this test (but may be on the final exam). Campbell doesn't really say what I want to say about this. I will prepare notes which will be posted between now and Monday's class. We will also finish and tie together the discussion from last Thursday at the beginning of the review class.



Comments:
Post a Comment



<< Home

For earlier posts, find the "Blog archives" heading at the top of the left column and click on the month of your choice.