Wednesday, December 21, 2005

 

Exam format and correction

Exact format of the exam

There are 5 multiple choice questions (4 you need to answer because one is a freebie) (15 points = 9.4%)

There are 35 matching questions where you are given a definition or example and you have to choose which term from a list matches that definition or example (35 points = 21.9%)
12 are sound changes, borrowing, analogical change, and semantic change
7 are terminology from reconstruction and classification chapters
16 are terminology from writing systems slides and lectures

There are 2 reconstruction problems (one comparative and one internal) (40 points each = 25% each)

There is one essay question (30 points = 18.8%)

There is an IPA chart provided on the test paper.

Most (though not all) of the descriptions you need to name processes in the reconstructions are listed somewhere on the test paper.

Correction to Grimm's Law sheet

There is a small mistake on the Grimm's Law review sheet. At the bottom of Page 1 where it says "[-voice] became [-voice]" it should be "[+voice] became [-voice]" – otherwise it doesn't make sense. This is not critical for the exam and it is correct on the next page.


 

Cahuilla solution

I have posted the solution to the Cahuilla problem we did for homework. Reading this will help you with one of the questions on the exam.


Sunday, December 18, 2005

 

Hints on the essay question

Some students have told me that they don't understand the essay questions I posted and can't find out anything about them in the textbook, so I have prepared extensive notes on the 5 exam essay topics pointing you to some things that you might choose to discuss. Do not try to put all of these points into your essay or you'll be writing a book instead of an exam answer. Just pick the most interesting points you can fit into 2-4 hand-written pages. You should have no shortage of things to say. Remember to give evidence to support any claims you make.

I forgot to mention earlier that you can write the essay in either English or French, whichever you are most comfortable with. Note that the exam sheet will not have these 6 pages of notes, just the 5 questions themselves. You cannot use any notes once the exam begins.

I have reworded two of the questions slightly since I first posted them, changing "gradualism" to "gradual change" and "written records" to "written documents" (although I'm including wall carvings and all sorts of things in the word "documents").


 

Writing systems slides

Finally, I have uploaded the writing systems slides for your reference. There are two different versions, both in PDF format:

Because of the Chinese and Japanese fonts in these files it might be necessary to get the version of Acrobat Reader that can handle these if you don't already have it.


Saturday, December 17, 2005

 

What you should know for the exam

Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Kinds of sound change: Chapter 3: Borrowing Chapter 4: Analogical change Chapter 5: Comparative method Chapter 6: Linguistic classification Chapter 7: Models of change Chapter 8: Internal reconstruction Chapter 9: Semantic and lexical change Chapter 10: Syntactic change Chapter 11: Explaining linguistic change Chapter 12: Areal linguistics Chapter 13: Distant genetic relationships Chapter 14: The role of written records. Chapter 15: Linguistic prehistory Not in the book:

 

Typology and universals

If you are thinking about answering the exam essay question about typology and universals, you would probably find it useful to read David Crystal's 2-page chapter on typology and universals for more clarification on what these are.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

 

Essay questions for the final exam

On the final exam, you will be asked to write an essay of a couple of pages on ONE of the following topics. You can choose to argue either for or against any of the following statements. You can prepare ahead of time, but you cannot bring notes with you to the exam.

  1. "Phonological reconstruction is never an automatic mechanical process. Linguists can only be guided by general principles to carry out their reconstructions." Discuss with reference to both comparative and internal reconstruction.
  2. "Gradual change and Neogrammarianism are incompatible." Discuss.
  3. "Using written documents to date a linguistic change is not as simple as it first appears." Discuss.
  4. Research in typology and universals has increasingly replaced absolute universals with implicational universals and tendencies. Discuss whether this makes the study of typology and universals more or less relevant for historical linguistics.
  5. "If a present-day expert in Proto-Indo-European or some other reconstructed language could travel back in time and speak it to the proto-language's native speakers, he or she would not be understood." Discuss.

For earlier posts, find the "Blog archives" heading at the top of the left column and click on the month of your choice.